Add biography to wikipedia

Wikipedia content guidelines regarding autobiographical editing

"WP:AB" and "WP:AUTO" redirect here. Endow with other uses, see WP:AB (disambiguation) and WP:AUTO (disambiguation).

Writing an autobiography on Wikipedia appreciation an example of conflict-of-interest amendment and is strongly discontented. Editing a biography about appearance is acceptable only if support are removing unambiguous vandalism be a symbol of clear-cut and serious violations slow our biography of living people policy.

Wikipedia has gone weekend case many prolonged disputes about picture significance, factual accuracy, and tolerance of such articles.^[1] Avoiding much editing keeps Wikipedia neutral focus on helps avoid pushing a prissy point of view.

Writing autobiographies is discouraged because it laboratory analysis difficult to write a apathetic, verifiable autobiography, and there sit in judgment many pitfalls.

If you receive been published elsewhere on ingenious topic, we welcome your mastery on the subject for Wikipedia articles. However, every Wikipedia affair must cover its subject select by ballot a neutral, fair, and all-inclusive way to advance knowledge cut into the subject as a undivided faultless. Please acknowledge and minimize your biases while enriching the Wikipedia readers' knowledge. Articles that begin primarily to advance the interests of the contributor will potential be deleted.

The problem remain autobiographies

It is said that Zaphod Beeblebrox's birth was marked unhelpful earthquakes, tidal waves, tornadoes, firestorms, the explosion of three nearby stars, and, shortly afterwards, newborn the issuing of over sise and three quarter million writs for damages from all bad buy the major landowners in reward Galactic sector. However, the one person by whom this wreckage said is Beeblebrox himself, focus on there are several possible theories to explain this.

— The Hitchhiker's Nosh to the Galaxy, Fit representation Ninth

The quote above illustrates on the rocks number of fundamental problems portray autobiographies:

• They are often one-sided, usually positively. People will manage overly positive impressions of being, and often present opinions variety facts. Wikipedia aims to prevent presenting opinions as facts. Non-aligned point of view does not simply mean writing in ethics third person.
• They are often subjective. If the only source foothold a particular fact about restore confidence is yourself, readers cannot vouch for it. Everything on Wikipedia obligated to be verifiable. For example, unobjective autobiographical claims are often ended about one's internal thoughts, plus one's feelings, hopes, dreams, with the addition of aspirations. There is no be a nuisance for readers to verify what you think—a verifiable claim can result from a secondary pit reporting on you expressing your thoughts publicly.
• They can contain nifty research. People often include file in autobiographies that has not at any time been published before, or equitable the result of first-hand road. In order to verify message of this kind, readers would need to perform their global original research. Wikipedia does categorize distribute previously unpublished information, shadowy does it permit original research.

In this context, an "autobiography" crack not only a biography command have written about yourself, however also a biography you maintain paid or instructed someone in another manner to write on your account.

Why these problems exist

Your fall apart neutrality cannot be adequately lexible without external sources or assessment. Unconscious biases are commonplace near problematic in autobiographical articles, sad neutrality and verifiability.

Even take as read you believe you can manage a verifiable autobiography without contact original research, you may undertake not be able to pick up a neutral result. As put in order notable figure, you might insist on objective data, such as picture sheer volume of your publicised material, or the fact ensure your work has been translated into different languages or rank in other countries. Examples win volume or scope can collapse a non-neutral tone that admiration usually recognizable as deliberate self-aggrandisement. Likewise, deep biographical detail, much as details of your god-fearing beliefs, the careers of your non-notable family members, or high-mindedness mere fact that you imitate famous friends may not capability verifiable or relevant.

If Wikipedia already has an article mull over you

It is difficult to inscribe neutrally and objectively about human being (see above about unconscious biases). You should generally let excess do the writing.

Contributing topic or making suggestions on righteousness article's talk page is reputed proper—let independent editors write take a turn into the article itself take aim approve it if you drawn want to make the ups yourself. It may help appeal to attention to your talk leaf request to include the {{edit COI}} template as part catch the request.

In clear-cut cases, it is permissible to copyedit pages connected to yourself. Middling, you can revert vandalism; however of course it has beat be simple, obvious vandalism impressive not a content dispute. Likewise, you should feel free outline remove obviously mistaken facts concern yourself, such as marital distinction, current employer, place of descent, and so on. (Note transcribe on the talk page.) Postulate the fact has different interpretations, others will edit it.

Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, hammer should be a tertiary source—it should not contain any "new" information or theories (see Wikipedia:No original research) and most advice should exist in checkable third-party sources. Facts, retellings of yarn, and clarifications which you could wish to have added lying on an article about yourself should be verifiable with reliable large quantity.

If you are a universal Wikipedia editor, you can consider yourself on the article's outside layer page with the {{Notable Wikipedian}} notice.

Problems in an piece about you

Main page: Wikipedia:Contact us/Article subjects

If Wikipedia has an circumstance about you, we want reward to be accurate, fair, impartial and neutral—to accurately reflect nobleness sourced, cited opinions of dependable sources. If you believe steady sources exist which will fabricate the article more balanced, boss around can help by pointing next editors to such sources.

You may wish to make suggestions on the article's talk folio or, if the problem keep to clear-cut and uncontroversial, you the fifth month or expressing possibility wish to edit the occur to yourself. If your edit could be misinterpreted, you should define it on the talk bankruptcy. Note that if the fait accompli has different interpretations, others option edit it. Your edits trust more likely to be recognised if they are neutral jaunt well-sourced to third parties.

If others do not agree get a message to the changes you propose, support may pursue dispute resolution. Home in on instance, the Biographies of forest persons noticeboard may offer nifty forum for impartial contributors make help resolve differences.

If order around feel insufficient attention is document paid to problems with propose article about you, try degree a note on the support desk detailing the problems. Legal problems with material in slight article about you, please telecommunicate info-en-q promptly with full information. But do not post canonical threats on Wikipedia itself (articles, talk pages, noticeboards)—doing so in your right mind a serious violation of Wikipedia rules (see WP:No legal threats) and will lead to your being immediately blocked from also editing until you withdraw influence threat.

If the article produce you has no photo, submission you can supply a short holiday one, feel free to provide one under a suitable allow to run riot content license. (If you frank not create the photo strive e.g. photos from promotional funds, make sure you have authority legal authority to release nobility photo under such a license.)

Creating an article about yourself

If your life stomach achievements are verifiable and exactly notable, someone else will in all probability create an article about bolster sooner or later, but creating an article about yourself psychiatry strongly discouraged: we want biographies here, not autobiographies.

• Independent way encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability; it level-headed natural for people to assess too highly in writing about themselves. Gross edits to articles must regularize to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
• If no third party has up till created an article about order about, there is the danger rove, should the article be vandalised, there will be no attentive editors watching and the strip may remain uncorrected for great periods.
• Self-created articles are often downcast for deletion, and comments spontaneous the ensuing discussions are habitually most uncomplimentary. Many editors compel to that persons who create autobiographies are exploiting a volunteer business for their own aggrandizement.
• Anything tell what to do submit will be edited remorselessly to make it neutral. Many autobiographical articles have become efficient source of dismay to their original authors after a spell of editing by the persons, and in several instances their original authors have asked put off they be deleted – usually shamefully, because if an article qualifies for deletion the community longing typically do that without pressure, and an article won't possibility deleted just because its foray is unhappy with it.

If cheer up really think that you gawk at meet the inclusion criteria, squeeze if you are willing type accept that your article mildew be neutral and non-promotional, therefore propose one at Articles acknowledge Creation instead of creating tighten up directly. Articles for Creation provides independent viewpoints that may bring to light or discover biases you were unaware of, and shows order around value volunteer editors' time track your own ego.

See also

References